Classidential, a blog by [Redacted]

Morgoth's Best

The following is a transcribed excerpt from this video.⤻ I recommend you listen to the whole thing, but this particular portion really stuck out to me and I felt it was worth sharing.

I've noted before that when it suits these narratives, they step outside the Liberal Paradigm. But if you ask them what they actually want, then the answer is something benign. Something like 'we want equal pay' or 'we want to be on TV as much as you'. The underlying concept of 500 years of 'Whiteness' erasing their identity, othering them, and destroying the world takes a backseat. What we get is the mundane. They're doing a Motte and Bailey⤻. 'It's just about equality'. But hang on a minute! Isn't egalitarianism a product of 'Whiteness'? Is that not a philosophical idea that came from the very culture and people you've declared metaphysically evil to be dethroned, so you can fulfill your destiny as members of the consumer proletariat? They step within the Liberal frame when it suits them, then step out to attack and deconstruct. The Europeans they attack are trapped within the bubble of liberalism and modern Western thought. We've been bent over this rack for a long time.

The critiques leveled at Europeans rely on them being more or less signed up to liberalism and egalitarianism to take it seriously. Otherwise, why should anyone care about them, the diversity, whether they're represented and fawned over enough. Because if I'm not a liberal, why should I care about their complaints at all? They've already rejected almost every other liberal value which makes their complaints even more facile.

Did Europeans colonise places?
Yes.
Do you feel bad about it?
No.
Oh then you're a bad person.

Under what morality or philosophy? The one that you're deconstructing and calling oppressive? The one that caused 500 years of oppressive 'Whiteness'? Why should I check my privilege? Social justice, equality, egalitarianism, humanism, civil rights, individualism? Because it's rational? Is that where this moral framework stems from? They're all products of the Enlightenment and the modern West and therefore a creation of 'White Supremacy'.

They deconstruct Western Liberal values by relying on Western Liberal values to ground their own ideology. This is the grand arc of liberalism collapsing in on itself. How would a conversation of Evola and Noel Ignatiev have gone? Ignatiev would have started by rolling out the talking points about 'Whiteness' and oppression. Evola would have rejected the premise that any sort of equality was even desirable to begin with. If a Hindu complains that I enjoy a steak, I'll politely explain to him that I'm not a Hindu and don't have to abide by the rules of his religion. In the same way, I'm not a Leftist or a Liberal, so arguments about egalitarianism mean pretty much nothing to me.

Hopefully this excerpt is enough to get your curiosity up to go and listen to the whole video. The creator, Morgoth's Review⤻, puts out a good amount of stuff. Consider adding him to your rotation.

Yours Truly,
[Redacted]